Legal Opinion
United States v. Christopher Gill
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 31, 2003No. 01-6538PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAWSON, District Judge.
The United States Sentencing Commission has prescribed a methodology that trial courts must use to determine a sentencing range in a criminal case. A key ingredient of the sentencing formula in drug cases is the quantity of a controlled substance for which a convicted defendant will be held accountable. A defendant is responsible for all drug quantities that are included within the scope of his “relevant conduct,” as that term is defined by the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual. In this case, Christopher Gill, the defendant, contends that his sentence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Harvey E. Page (99-5361) Thomas Andre Powers (99-5449) Keith Linton (99-5451) David Shawn Hill (99-5456)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. InnamoratiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Kenneth Joseph HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Darwin Jay Copeland Anthony Antoine HartwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. James Ronald HazelwoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David CasillasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Robert John Jansen, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.