Legal Opinion

United States v. Harvey E. Page (99-5361) Thomas Andre Powers (99-5449) Keith Linton (99-5451) David Shawn Hill (99-5456)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 9, 2000No. 99-5361, 99-5449, 99-5451 and 99-5456PublishedCited by 217 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATZ, District Judge.

Defendants were charged with conspiracy to distribute and to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine base (crack). In addition, defendants Powers, Linton, and Hill were charged in substantive counts with distribution of cocaine base. They were each convicted on all counts with which they were charged. They raise numerous issues on appeal, most of which do not merit publication under Rule 206(a) of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. In this opinion, we address only the following issues: (1) whether the district court erred when it declined to suppress statements and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by217 opinions

  1. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. WagenerIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API