Legal Opinion
Robert John Jansen, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 21, 2004No. 02-4215PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge.
Defendant, Robert John Jansen, Jr., filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, asserting that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue at his sentencing for drug possession with intent to distribute that the amount of drugs in his possession intended for personal use should not have been included in the base offense level calculation. The District Court held that, assuming trial counsel was ineffective in this regard, defendant was not prejudiced for the reason that there was a strong connection between the drugs defendant intended to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Marva Headley, A/K/A "Brenda"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Jermyn v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Matthew L. WyssCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Dean KippCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. IglesiasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. OteroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Todd R. DaviesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Timothy HortonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. AshfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.