Legal Opinion

United States v. Innamorati

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 17, 1993No. Nos. 91-1896 to 91-1903, 91-1924 and 92-1253PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

In this case ten individuals challenge, on a wide variety of grounds, their convictions and sentences following a jury trial in the district court.1 All ten defendants were found guilty of conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). All defendants except Thompson were convicted of one or more additional counts relating to the ring’s activities. For the reasons that follow, we reverse defendant Grady’s conviction on one count for insufficient evidence and remand for resentencing,…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Abu AliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Harvey E. Page (99-5361) Thomas Andre Powers (99-5449) Keith Linton (99-5451) David Shawn Hill (99-5456)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API