Collado v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
Margo Collado (appellant) was convicted in a jury trial of child abuse in violation of Code § 18.2-371.1. On appeal she contends: 1) the evidence was insufficient to prove she was the criminal agent and that she intended to inflict serious injury, 2) the trial court erred in not granting a jury instruction that stated she was required to have had an intent to cause the injuries inflicted upon the victim, and 3) the trial court erred in admitting, at sentencing, a letter setting forth other incidents of child abuse. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Sandoval v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Pugliese v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mangano v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
- Flowers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Cecelia Leigh Burnette v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuffolk County Circuit Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. VickSouthampton County Circuit Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.