Legal Opinion

Collado v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 5, 2000No. 0438994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

Margo Collado (appellant) was convicted in a jury trial of child abuse in violation of Code § 18.2-371.1. On appeal she contends: 1) the evidence was insufficient to prove she was the criminal agent and that she intended to inflict serious injury, 2) the trial court erred in not granting a jury instruction that stated she was required to have had an intent to cause the injuries inflicted upon the victim, and 3) the trial court erred in admitting, at sentencing, a letter setting forth other incidents of child abuse. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Sandoval v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  3. Marable v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  4. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Pugliese v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mangano v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  2. Flowers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  3. Cecelia Leigh Burnette v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownSuffolk County Circuit Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. VickSouthampton County Circuit Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API