Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 14, 1991No. Record No. 0049-89-3PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UPON HEARING EN BANC

Opinion

BARROW, J.

This is a criminal appeal heard by this court sitting en banc. In it we consider the application of the contemporaneous objection rule to a challenge to the sufficiency of evidence of guilt. Also, we address the nature of the evidence necessary to prove the intent required for malicious wounding in a case of child abuse.

We hold that where an issue of sufficiency of evidence is presented to a trial court, sitting without a jury, in a motion to strike at the conclusion of the Commonwealth’s evidence and, upon its denial and upon conclusion of the defendant’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Floyd v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  2. Banovitch v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Hargrave v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  4. Norman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  5. Bryant v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Martin v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Ragland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  3. Grinton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  4. Lash v. County of HenricoCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Knight v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API