Sandoval v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, Judge.
Paulino DeJesus Sandoval (appellant) appeals from his bench trial convictions by the Circuit Court of Gloucester County (trial court) for breaking and entering with the intent to commit larceny, Code § 18.2-91, and of credit card theft, Code § 18.2-192. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he was guilty of either charge.
Where the issue is whether the evidence is sufficient, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom. Higginbotham, v. Commonwealth, 216 Va. 349,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Schneider v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- Ridley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Carter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by259 opinions
- Flanagan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Towler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Baylor v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Wood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.