Legal Opinion

Smith v. Local 819 I.B.T. Pension Plan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 20, 2002No. Docket No. 01-7583PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge.

Local 819 I.B.T. Pension Plan and its Board of Trustees (the “Trustees”) are defendants in a putative class action brought by plan participant Esther Smith, alleging that the plan has been non-compliant with the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) since 1976 (and non-compliant with state law as well), and that these deficiencies were uncorrected or insufficiently cured by a 1997 revision made by the Plan and its Trustees in response to earlier litigation. The Plan and its Trustees appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Rolon v. HennemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Colby v. Umbrella, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. Kirch v. Liberty Media Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Phillips v. Reed Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. In Re Refco, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API