Legal Opinion
Buchanan v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Decided March 3, 2004No. 07-02-0502-CRPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
BRIAN QUINN, Justice.
Appellant Denzel R. Buchanan appeals his convictions for manufacturing of at least 400 grams or more of methamphetamine and for possession with intent to deliver less than four grams but at least one gram of the same controlled substance. In doing so, he alleges that 1) the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence purportedly garnered during a search and seizure and 2) he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Background
On October 8, 2001, Sergeant Roy Pierce of the South Plains…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- McNairy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Duhig v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Tijerina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Rodgers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.