Lorenzana v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
The crucial question we face here is whether a citizen may properly be subjected to the peering of the policeman who, without a search warrant, walks over ground to which the public has not been invited but which has been reserved for private enjoyment, stands by a window on the side of a house and peeks through a two-inch gap between the drawn window shade and the sill, and thus manages to observe the conduct of those within the residence. We conclude that the questioned police procedure too closely resembles the process of the police state, too dangerously intrudes upon…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by271 opinions
- People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
266 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.