Legal Opinion

Snohomish County v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1994No. 60672-2PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

On October 7, 1993, pursuant to a request for accelerated review, we issued an order affirming the trial court’s judgment that Snohomish County Ordinance 93-004 is not subject to referendum. Our October 7, 1993, order noted that the opinion explaining the decision would be filed in due course. We do so today. We affirm the trial court’s judgment that ordinance 93-004, passed pursuant to a 1991 amendment to Washington State’s Growth Management Act (GMA), is not subject to referendum. We do not address whether the amendment or the GMA is constitutional, or whether the Snohomish County Council…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. RoadhsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Citizens for Financially Responsible Government v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Neils v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Linn v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. 1000 Friends of Washington v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. 1000 Friends v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Snohomish County v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API