Legal Opinion

Citizens for Financially Responsible Government v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1983No. 47859-7PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

The main question is whether a city ordinance enacting a business and occupation (B & 0) tax is subject to referendum. It is.

A group of Spokane citizens sought a writ of mandamus to compel the City of Spokane to accept for filing certain referendum petitions. The purpose of the petitions was the repeal of, or in the alternative, a referendum on city ordinance C-25792, an ordinance relating to and providing for a B & 0 tax upon businesses, occupational pursuits and privileges within the city. The city clerk refused to accept the petitions for filing because of the city attorney's opinion *341that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Ruano v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. O'DAY v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Arborwood Idaho v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Arborwood Idaho, L.L.C. v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API