Citizens for Financially Responsible Government v. City of Spokane
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
The main question is whether a city ordinance enacting a business and occupation (B & 0) tax is subject to referendum. It is.
A group of Spokane citizens sought a writ of mandamus to compel the City of Spokane to accept for filing certain referendum petitions. The purpose of the petitions was the repeal of, or in the alternative, a referendum on city ordinance C-25792, an ordinance relating to and providing for a B & 0 tax upon businesses, occupational pursuits and privileges within the city. The city clerk refused to accept the petitions for filing because of the city attorney's opinion *341that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alderwood Associates v. Washington Environmental CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Ruano v. SpellmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- O'DAY v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Arborwood Idaho v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Arborwood Idaho, L.L.C. v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.