Legal Opinion

City of Sequim v. Malkasian

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 2006No. 74987-6PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

f 1

Madsen, J.

This case requires the court to review a procedural tangle. Prior to an election, the city of Sequim, acting through its city council, sought a declaratory judg*254ment that a proposed initiative, the Ratepayer’s Responsibility Act, was beyond the scope of initiative power of the residents of Sequim, Washington. The trial court disagreed with the city, granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Paul Malkasian, and ordered the initiative placed on the ballot. Although the city appealed, the Court of Appeals declined to stay the trial court’s ruling and the election went…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Arkison v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Arkison v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Michael v. Mosquera-LacyWashington Supreme Court · 2009

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API