1000 Friends v. McFarland
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Our state constitution sets forth the blueprint for the structure of our state government. Central to that structure is the sovereignty of the people of the state of Washington because “[a] 11 political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.” Const, art. I, § 1; see also Const, art. II, § 1; Paget v. Logan, 78 Wn.2d 349, 352, 474 P.2d 247 (1970).
Chambers, J.
¶2 The people of the State are sovereign. Local subdivisions, like King County, are subject to that…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CoatsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Woods v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In re the Personal Restraint of BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.