Legal Opinion

Heer v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 29, 2014No. 14-2009UnpublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

CAROLYN B. McHUGH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a products liability suit brought by Suzanne Heer against Costco Wholesale Corporation, Rubbermaid, Inc., and Tricam Industries, Inc. (collectively, Defendants). Ms. Heer seeks damages for injuries she sustained while using a Rubbermaid step stool that she purchased at Costco and that Tricam Industries designed and manufactured. On appeal, Ms. Heer challenges two orders of the district court. First, she claims the district court applied the wrong legal standard and abused its discretion by granting Defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Roe v. FCA USCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  2. Norris v. Excel Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
  3. 100 Mount Holly Bypass v. Axos BankDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025
  4. Browder v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
  5. Browder v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API