Legal Opinion

100 Mount Holly Bypass v. Axos Bank

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 18, 2025No. 2:20-cv-00856Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH 100 MOUNT HOLLY BYPASS et al., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 4 AND 6 v. Case No. 2:20-cv-00856-TS AXOS BANK, et al., Judge Ted Stewart Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Axos Bank’s Motions in Limine Nos. 4 and 6 filed in anticipation of the bench trial beginning on September 22, 2025. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny the Motions. Defendant seeks to exclude the Expert Reports and testimony of Plaintiffs’ experts, James Schallheim,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Attorney General of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Gulf States Utilities Company v. Ecodyne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API