Legal Opinion
Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 28, 2004No. 04-1053PublishedCited by 755 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Ernest J. Hill, III, a prisoner appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendant pharmaceutical companies and motion to dismiss for the United States and Bureau of Prisons staff members on his tort claims arising from injuries allegedly caused from taking prescription medication. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and AFFIRM. *
I
By his own admission, Hill suffers from a number of mental disorders, including anxiety and panic disorder. While incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, Administrative Maximum at…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Gregory Lee Rucks v. Gary BoergermannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Emmett Ray McCarthy v. Dr. F. Weinberg, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Jerome MacLin v. Dr. FreakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by755 opinions
- Steffey v. OrmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Sinclair Wyoming Refining v. A & B BuildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Lippoldt v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Toevs v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Yu Kikumura v. OsagieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
750 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.