In Re Thompson
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District for reinstatement as a member of the Bar of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
WORKS, J., pro tem.
On January 6, 1911, the petitioner, together with another, was indicted by the United States grand jury for a violation of the terms of section 5470 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, [U. S. Comp. Stats. 1916, see. 10,364; 5 Fed. Stats. Ann., 1st ed., p. 968], which provides, in effect, that “Any person who shall buy, receive, or conceal, or aid in buying, receiving, or concealing” any of various documents, contracts, evidences of indebtedness, or articles, all of which are specifically mentioned in the statute, “knowing any such article or thing to have been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Matter of Application of ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- In re TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re BurrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Drazen v. New Haven Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- In re KerlIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.