Legal Opinion

In re Treadwell

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1896No. 9761PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Application in the Supreme Court for the restoration of W. B. Treadwell to the roll of attorneys. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

On the second day of April, 1885, -on proceedings had therefor, an order was made and entered by this court striking the name of W. B. Treadwell, then an attorney of this court, from the roll of attorneys and counselors, and prohibiting him from practicing as such attorney, upon the ground that said Treadwell had, in his capacity as such attorney, been guilty of misappropriating moneys intrusted to his keeping.

An application is now made in behalf of Mr. Tread-well by E. B. and George H. Mastick, attorneys of this court in ■ good standing, asking that he be restored to said roll of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. In Re AndreaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Preston v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In re SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API