Youngs v. West
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
On January Í5,1945, plaintiff Bert Youngs instituted a chancery action in Ingham county, in the nature of discovery for the purpose of. restraining defendants Wests and Miller from interfering with his possession, control and management of lands on which coal was being excavated by defendant Lewis & Prisinger and stored, sold and merchandised by defendant Ralph E. Smallidge. Youngs sought to prevent the transfer of title to the land and cancellation of deeds pertaining thereto. He also desired specific performance of certain agreements and a declaration of his rights as to others.
Youngs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Andrews v. KibbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Hackley v. MackMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Landskroener v. HenningMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Hannan v. FreundMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Peczeniuk v. DanielakMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tkachik v. MandevilleMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Temple Marital TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Van Etten v. MANUF. NAT'L BANK OF DETROITMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- In re Filibeck EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.