Legal Opinion

Hannan v. Freund

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The parties to this suit live in Detroit in the block bounded by Woodward avenue on the east, Second avenue on the west, Boston boulevard on the north, and Chicago boulevard on the south. Prior to 1916, this block contained a T shaped alley 20 feet wide. The north and south alley commenced about 200 feet west of Woodward, and ran through the block from Boston to Chicago boulevard, and the east and west alley commenced at Second avenue and ran easterly to the intersection of the north and south alley. In 1916 the common council, on the.petition of defendant Siegel, vacated the northerly 162%…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Root v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Andrews v. KibbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Hackley v. MackMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McGuire v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Thomas v. NicollsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Youngs v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Burton v. FreundMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. American State Bank v. Van DykeMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API