Peczeniuk v. Danielak
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
The bill herein was filed to foreclose a real estate mortgage, given plaintiff by defendants Skurko.in April, 1927, but not placed of record until the following month of October. Defendants Danielak were made parties to the suit because of purchase of the premises from the mortgagors. Defendants Skurko, by cross-bill, asked for relief in the nature of indebitatus assumpsit against defendants Danielak growing out of dealings between them and, by like cross-bill, defendants Danielak asked for similar relief against the Skurkos. Plaintiff abandoned the foreclosure suit and the claims of…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Youngs v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Monroe v. BixbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951