Legal Opinion

State v. Backstrand

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 2009No. C071116CR, A136163PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*625ROSENBLUM, J.

Following a trial to the court, defendant was convicted of misdemeanor driving while revoked. ORS 811.182. He makes two assignments of error on appeal. In the first, he assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of his identity and the fact that his driver’s license had been revoked, arguing that the arresting officer learned that information as a result of illegally stopping defendant without reasonable suspicion. In his second assignment of error, which defendant concedes is unpreserved, he argues that the charging instrument did not allege…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BackstrandOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. StookeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. LeinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API