Legal Opinion

State v. Knapp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 24, 2012No. C100016CR, C090068CR, C091133CR; A145259, A145260, A145261PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Defendant was found guilty of unlawful possession of methamphetamine in one case and had his probation revoked in two other cases based, in part, on having unlawfully possessed methamphetamine. Defendant asserts that the trial court in the possession case should have granted his motion to suppress the methamphetamine, and thus his conviction, as well as his probation revocations, should be reversed. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

In reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, we view the record, and all the inferences that it will support, in the light…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. Meza-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API