Legal Opinion

Yerex v. Eineder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Lapeer. (Moore. J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff owns the E £ of the S. W. £ of section 22, township 8 N., of range 12 E., in Lapeer ■county. The defendant owns the W. £ of the same quarter, same section, township, and range. It was claimed by plaintiff that the water from the lowlands of defendant — a marsh or swamp — was diverted from its natural flow, and carried upon the lands of plaintiff, to *25bis damage, by means of a ditch dug upon defendant’s premises. The action was commenced in justice’s court, where plaintiff had judgment. Upon appeal to the circuit court, verdict and judgment passed for the defendant. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Breen v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Finkbinder v. ErnstMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Schrag v. Blaze Fork Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Miller v. ZahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Ruehs v. SchantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API