Legal Opinion

Finkbinder v. Ernst

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Case by Charles Einkbinder against Christian Ernst for the wrongful flooding of plaintiff’s lands. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought to recover damages to plaintiff’s land and certain crops growing thereon, caused by defendant’s erecting a dam upon his own land, which plaintiff claims turned the waters which naturally flowed across defendant’s land upon and across certain lands of plaintiff.

It is claimed in the declaration that prior to June, 1898* the defendant wrongfully, unlawfully, and wantonly, by artificial means, gathered the surface water falling and flowing upon his own lands, and caused the same to flow through such lands onto the land' of one Hotrum, and thence onto and across the land of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Leidlein v. MeyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Yerex v. EinederMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Beardsley Land & Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Priest v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. O'Connor v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Village of Trenton v. RuckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Township of Merritt v. HarpMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API