Legal Opinion

Schrag v. Blaze Fork Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1925No. 25,992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*170The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one for mandatory injunction to require the removal of a dam placed in plaintiff’s drainage ditch, and to enjoin the collection of special assessments levied on plaintiff’s land to maintain the defendant’s drainage system. The plaintiff prevailed, and defendant appeals.

About two and one-half miles west of McPherson is located a fresh-water marsh or swamp designated on the United States geological maps as a sink or depression without natural drainage, outlet. It covers about 2,000 acres and has been generally known as “The…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. BrookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Pettigrew v. Village of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Meranda v. SpurlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Dorr v. SimmersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Aldritt v. FleischauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor Investment Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Tillotson v. FairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Alber v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. State ex rel. Logan v. North Topeka Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Schrag v. Blaze Fork Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API