Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 6, 1980No. 7928DC953PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Defendant first contends that the court erred in hearing the motion for summary judgment in this cause when the motion was filed in 77 CVM 2317 rather than in this cause which is 78 CVD 1226.
When this case was called for trial, plaintiff requested a hearing on her motion for summary judgment. Defendant objected on the ground that there was no motion for summary judgment pending in this cause. Upon discovering that said motion had been given the wrong case number, plaintiff orally moved to be allowed to amend the caption number of the motion for summary judgment from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Mangum v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Taylor v. Triangle Porsche-Audi, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Miller v. B.H.B. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Quality Inns International, Inc. v. Booth, Fish, Simpson, Harrison & HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Vincent v. Clean Water Action ProjectColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rutherford Electric Membership Corp. v. 130 of Chatham, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.