Quality Inns International, Inc. v. Booth, Fish, Simpson, Harrison & Hall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.. Plaintiff’s claims for relief are grounded in tort, asserting defendants’ negligence in the performance of their duties as trustee under the deed of trust and as lawyers owing a duty to plaintiff as a client. In regard to summary judgment in a negligence action, our Supreme Court has stated:
As a general proposition, issues of negligence are ordinarily not susceptible of summary adjudication either for or against the claimant “but should be resolved by trial in the ordinary manner.” 6 Pt. 2 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 56.17[42] at 946 (2d ed. 1980). Hence, it is only in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Jenkins v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Martinson Manufacturing Co. v. SeerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Raleigh Federal Savings Bank v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Watkiss & Saperstein v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.