Legal Opinion

Ames v. Parrott

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1901No. 9,489PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Dickinson, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

Parrott, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, sued Ames, hereinafter styled defendant, setting up five causes of action for services rendered and money loaned. An order of attachment was issued at the instance of the plaintiff and levied upon the lands of the defendant. The latter moved to discharge the attachment on the ground that the levy was irregular and invalid, and is here upon error from the order of the court overruling such motion, and from the judgment of the court in favor of the plaintiff upon the main case.

The sheriff’s return shows that upon receipt of the order of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gates v. TustenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Norvell v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Martin v. LemonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  4. Sharp v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Fisher v. PorterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Milks v. Iowa Oto-Head & Neck Specialists, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Engen v. Rambler Copper & Platium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Power v. Federal Land BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Havens-White Coal Co. v. Bank of RuloNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API