Legal Opinion

Norvell v. Porter

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error to Louisiana Court of Common Pleas. cited Hnthsing vs. Maus, 36 Mo., 101; Wagn. Stat., 182, § 6; Ellis vs. Lamme, 42 Mo., 153.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, Judge

Attachment suit; ground, non-residence. Writ as to defendant returned non est, and as to Wells, a garnishee, the return was as follows :

“Served the within writ in the township of Calumet, county of Pike and State of Missouri, on the 5th day of December, 1873, at 7 o’clock in the morning, by summoning James B. Wells, as garnishee, to appear before the judge of the Louisiana Court of Common Pleas, to 'answer at the May term, 1874, touching his indebtedness to W. B. Porter.”

I

The motion of the defendant, who appeared by attorney, to quash the writ should have prevailed. The return, while it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewin v. DilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  2. Cannon v. McManusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  3. Green v. CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Huthsing v. MausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  5. Ellis v. LammeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wilson v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Raming v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Gates v. TustenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  4. St. Louis, Oak Hill & Carondelet Railway Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Calumet Paper Co. v. Haskell Show Printing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API