Martin v. Lemon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtStorrs, C. J.
The third section of the act to prevent and remove nuisances from highways, &e. (Rev. Stat. tit. xxxviii., sec. 3.) provides, that “ if any person &c., shall take any part of a highway into his field or enclosure, or erect any fence thereon, in such manner that such highway is made narrower than before, the selectmen of the town in which the offence is committed, or a committee appointed by the town for that purpose, shall give notice to the person so offending to remove such fence or encroachment within, a reasonable time not exceeding one month after such notice; and if such person shall…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gallup v. TracySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
3Cited by23 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Jack v. TorrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Frischer & Co. v. Bakelite CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- McNolty v. Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.