Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Mayer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1903No. 12,820PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

In July, 1899, Mayer Brothers, hereinafter called the defendants, became the owners of the building in controversy. At the time of the conveyance, said building was occupied by the Armstrong Clothing Company, a partnership, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, under an assignment to one of the partners of a lease made to another firm by the former owners. The lease expired on February 1,1900. At its expiration, the plaintiffs refused to surrender possession, and proceedings in forcible detainer were brought by the defendants, which resulted in-a finding of guilty and a judgment…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Nelson & Hatch v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  2. Stuart v. HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  3. Radcliffe v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  4. Wilkinson v. RoperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Carlow v. C. Aultman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Custer Public Power District v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gibson v. Koutsky-Brennan-Vana Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. O'Shea v. O'SheaNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dawson County Irrigation Co. v. StuartNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Higgins v. VandeveerNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API