Sharp v. Baird
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Crockett, J.:
It was admitted on the trial that on the 5th day of Rovember, 1855, Sanders and Brenham, under whom both parties claim, were the ■ owners in fee, and entitled to the possession of the demanded premises; and the case shows that on that day several attachments were issued against *578them, which the plaintiff claims were duly levied on this property. It further appears that the attachment suits soon afterwards ripened into judgments, on which executions subsequently issued, under which the property was purchased by the plaintiff at Sheriff’s sale, and for which, in due…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilkins v. TourtellottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Brusie v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- A. M. Holter Hardware Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
- Ames v. ParrottNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.