Legal Opinion

Diamond Alkali Co. v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1930No. 5613PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

This suit has been brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover alleged overpayments of 1916 and 1917 taxes which were made over protest and pursuant to threats of distraint. A jury trial was waived.

The plaintiff contends that the assessment and collection of the 1916 and 1917 tax in instant litigation were each made subsequent to the period prescribed by the statute for assessment and collection of the taxes for those years. The defendant asserts that the statutory limitation was waived, as to the 1916 tax, by written agreement between the taxpayer and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. United States v. John Barth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Diamond Alkali Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  2. Diamond Alkali Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Pittsburgh Can Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. William F. Taubel, Inc. v. SturgessDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API