Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 2, 1929No. 58PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McRetnolds

The United States by bill filed January 23, 1925, sought to recover from petitioners, stockholders of the Pine Lumber Company, additional income and profit taxes for the year 1918 assessed against that Corporation in March, 1924. The Company made a return to the Collector for 1918 on June 12, 1919, and afterwards paid the amount indicated thereby.

Petitioners claimed the suit was barred under the limitation specified by the applicable statute. They succeeded in the District Court; but the Circuit Court of Appeals held another view and reversed the decree dismissing the bill.

The statutory…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Aiken v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API