Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Can Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1940No. 7272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

By coincidence this is the third case arising out of World War No. 1 considered by this Court at this term. That war spread to the United States, disrupted inter alia industrial conditions and so afforded an opportunity for abnormal profits. In one case1 we held that those profits may have “disappointed” the United States but had not “deluded” them in the sense of the rule permitting relief. In another2 we did not permit a manufacturing company to ascribe its expansion to patriotism and so minimize *822its tax liability for excess profits. In the case át bar we are upholding…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Bowers, Collector of Internal Revenue v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. Same v. Seaman. Same v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evans v. MurffDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  2. Steingut v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  3. BERNARD v. COSBYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API