William F. Taubel, Inc. v. Sturgess
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
FAKE, District Judge.
The issues here arise on motions to strike out the answers to the complaints. The question of law is the same in each ease, and amounts to this: It being conceded that the collection of certain additional income and profits taxes were barred at the time pay*237ments thereof were made, inasmuch as more than five years had elapsed from the time the returns were filed, can the plaintiff recover these additional taxes, said payments having been made after elaims in abatement were filed and rejected, claims for refunds having also been rejected?
The answer to this inquiry involves…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bowers, Collector of Internal Revenue v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. Same v. Seaman. Same v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cadwalader v. SturgessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Diamond Alkali Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930