Legal Opinion

Potvin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2000No. S061945PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

After removal from defendant insurance company’s “preferred provider” lists, plaintiff physician brought this action. Citing the common law right to fair procedure, which forbids arbitrary expulsions from private organizations under certain circumstances, plaintiff alleged he should have been given reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard before his removal.

We first applied the common law doctrine of fair procedure in the late 19th century in two cases involving membership expulsions that adversely affected rights in specified funds held by the organization. Some 50…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of OrthodontistsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ezekial v. WinkleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Dangfeng Shen Ho v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Yari v. PRODUCERS GUILD OF AMERICA, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. In re Pomona Valley Medical Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop etc.California Court of Appeal · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API