Ezekial v. Winkley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
In this case we consider whether a surgical resident in a private teaching hospital must be accorded notice of charges *270and an opportunity to respond, pursuant to the “common law right of fair procedure” (Pinsker v. Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists (1974) 12 Cal.3d 541, 555 [116 Cal.Rptr. 245, 526 P.2d 253] (Pinsker II)), prior to dismissal from the residency program. We conclude that “fair procedure” principles are applicable to the facts pleaded herein. We therefore reverse the judgment of dismissal and remand with directions to overrule the demurrer to the first…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Marc A. Stretten v. Wadsworth Veterans HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Miller v. Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Garfinkle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.