Legal Opinion

McNeice v. Oil Carriers Joint Venture

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 22180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EGAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s objections to interrogatories filed by the plaintiff. Specifically, the defendant maintains that the information sought is privileged under the rulings of Hickman v. Taylor, 1947, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451 and Alltmont v. United States, 3 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 971.

As enunciated in many decisions, the party moving for discovery should be entitled to know upon what facts the other party is basing his allegations or defenses. Prescan v. Aliquippa & Southern R. Co., D.C.W.D.Pa.1954, 16 F.R.D. 272; Forsythe v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Prescan v. Aliquippa & Southern RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Forsythe v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Furmanek v. Southern Trading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maizie Boling Edgar v. Deborah Finley, a Minor, by Edward Finley, Her Next FriendCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  2. Lance, Inc. v. GinsburgDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Smigiel v. Compagnie De Transports OceaniquesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API