Forsythe v. Baltimore & O. R.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
In this action based upon the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., a petition is presented to compel answer to plaintiff’s interrogatory which is as follows:
“State on what conduct, course of conduct, acts of omission or commission on the part of the plaintiff you base the allegations of contributory negligence as set forth in your answer?”
Defendant refused to answer on the legal thesis that such facts must necessarily be based solely upon the knowledge and experience of counsel, constituting the work product of an attorney, and therefore being…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Needles v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Lincoln v. HerrDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by6 opinions
- B. & S. Drilling Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1959
- McElroy v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1957
- Territory of Alaska v. the Arctic MaidDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
- McNeice v. Oil Carriers Joint VentureDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Claster v. Citizens General Hospital, Pennsylvania Arbitration Panels for Health Care1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.