Legal Opinion

Furmanek v. Southern Trading Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1953No. 399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

Respondents except to all of the interrogatories propounded by libellant on the ground that in a preamble or introductory statement respondents are advised the interrogatories are to be deemed continuing so as to require supplemental answers if respondents obtain further information between the time answers are served and the time of trial. In other words, respondents contend that under Admiralty Rule 31, 28 U.S.C.A., a party is obliged to file and serve only one set of answers to interrogatories even though he subsequently acquires additional information with regard to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Acadia Overseas Freighters, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Novick v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. McNeice v. Oil Carriers Joint VentureDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API