Legal Opinion

Williams v. Town of Grifton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 7, 1974No. 743SC407PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

Petitioners contend that the Board of Commissioners was required to hold a public hearing before amending the annexation report on 11 December 1973. Under G.S. 160A-37 (d), before any territory may be annexed by a municipality, there must be a public hearing at which “all persons resident or owning property in the territory . . . and all residents of the municipality, shall be given an opportunity to be heard.” The Board of Commissioners of Grifton held such a public hearing on 14 June 1972. Under G.S. 160A-37(e), after the public hearing has been held, the Board of Commissioners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. ADAMS-MILLIS CORPORATION v. Town of KernersvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Coble v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Trotter v. HewittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conover v. NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. In Re City of Durham Annexation Ordinance Numbered 5991 for Area ACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Rexham Corporation v. Town of PinevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Gregory v. Town of PlymouthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API