Legal Opinion

In Re City of Durham Annexation Ordinance Numbered 5991 for Area A

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1984No. 8314SC891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Petitioners have assigned error to the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in Judge McLelland’s judgment:

Findings of Fact

1. The statutory procedure for annexation contained in North Carolina General Statutes Chapter 160A, Article 4A, part 3 consisting of Sections 160A-45 through 160A-56 and primarily contained in Section 160A-49 was followed by the Respondent, City of Durham, substantially and without any irregularity which misled or substantially prejudiced the interests of any of the petitioners.

2. The record filed by Respondent pursuant to G.S. 160A-50…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Texfi Industries, Inc. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Town of Boone v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Chapel Hill Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Matheson v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Campbell v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Knight v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API