Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Town of Plymouth

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 1983No. 822SC65PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

Petitioners bring forth fourteen (14) assignments of error and raise five (5) arguments on appeal. Petitioners’ first argument is that the Town of Plymouth was required to hold a public hearing on the amended proposal. We hold that it was not.

The Legislature has empowered municipal governing boards to “amend the report required by G.S. 160A-35 to make changes in the plans for serving the area proposed to be annexed so long as such changes meet the requirements of G.S. 160A-35.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-37(e) (1982). There is no requirement that a second public hearing be held on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conover v. NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Rexham Corporation v. Town of PinevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Williams v. Town of GriftonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chapel Hill Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Sonopress, Inc. v. Town of WeavervilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API