Legal Opinion

Conover v. Newton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 12, 1979No. 112PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Justice.

Appellant-Newton first raises a series of procedural assignments of error, which it is contended require this Court to reverse the superior court’s orders in Allman v. Newton and Conover v. Newton. These assignments of error although made on independent grounds are closely related in nature and will be considered together.

First, appellant-Newton contends that the trial court committed prejudicial error by proceeding to hear the plaintiffs’ converted motion for judgment on the pleadings in Allman v. Newton in that Newton was not given the requisite notice of such hearing.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Edward D. Oppenheimer, Robert A. Burger, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Morton Hotel Corporation, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. American Travel Corp. v. Central Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Pharmaresearch Corp. v. MashCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Ridings v. RidingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API