Legal Opinion

Dorris v. San Luis Valley Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 18, 1932No. 12,950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

John Dorris and Pedro Esquer, plaintiffs in error, will hereinafter be referred to as defendants, and the San Luis Valley Finance Company, a corporation, defendant in error, as plaintiff.

Plaintiff began an action in the justice of the peace court to1 recover damages from defendants for the alleged conversion of an automobile; upon trial, judgment was entered for defendants. An appeal was taken to the county court where, by reason of the disqualification of the county judge, the parties entered into a stipulation, upon which an order was entered, transferring the cause to the district court.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. v. Mallory, Son & Zimmerman Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mark P. Miller Milling Co. v. Butterfield-Elder Implement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Park v. GradyMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Murphy v. HobbsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  5. Barnard State Bank v. LankfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Tinkler (In Re Tinkler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2004
  2. Byron v. York Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  3. Cugnini v. Reynolds Cattle Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Pierce v. AckermanColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Herbertson v. CohenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API