Legal Opinion
Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Anzman (In Re Anzman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 13, 1986No. 19-10935PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER ON COMPLAINT
PATRICIA ANN CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, the plaintiff Armstrong Rubber Company (Armstrong) seeks an exception to discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(2)(B), (a)(4) and (a)(6). Armstrong asserts that the debt owed to it by debtor Fred H. Anzman is non-dischargeable because it was fraudulently procured by the making of a false financial statement and fraudulently extended by the failure to inform Armstrong of both his own and his company’s decline in financial condition. Additionally, Armstrong contends that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re Gerald JOHNSON, Bankrupt, CARLISLE CASHWAY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gerald JOHNSON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- In the Matter of Ben F. Garman, Bankrupt. The Northern Trust Company v. Ben F. GarmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Heinold Commodities & Securities, Inc. v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- In Re CoughlinBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mortgage Guaranty Insurance v. Pascucci (In Re Pascucci)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1988
- In Re SirianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Miller v. Krause (In Re Krause)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. v. Schulman (In Re Schulman)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Tague & Beem, P.C. v. Tague (In Re Tague)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.