Legal Opinion
Miller v. Armour & Co. (In Re Total Transportation, Inc.)
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1988No. Bankruptcy No. 4-85-1909, Adv. No. 4-87-233, Civ. No. 4-88-24PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Armour and Company’s motion for leave to appeal the order of the bankruptcy court denying its motion for reference of a tariff dispute to the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). Armour’s motion will be granted but the Court declines to refer the matter to the ICC.
FACTS
The debtor Total Transportation, Inc. (Total) was formerly a motor common carrier pursuant to a certification of public convenience by the ICC. In late 1984 through 1985 Total contracted with the defendant corporation Armour and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission, and Daniel R. Murray, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Lovett v. Honeywell, Inc. (In Re Transportation Systems International, Inc.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- Miller v. BTS Transport Services (In Re Total Transportation, Inc.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
- Bergquist v. 7/24 Freight Sales, Inc. (In Re Sharm Express, Inc.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.